<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Wandering Economist</title>
	<link>http://www.thewanderingeconomist.com</link>
	<description>Because "Its the Economy Stupid" isn't much of an answer.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 22:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Why we cannot save the &#8220;Too Big To Fail&#8221; banking institutions</title>
		<link>http://www.thewanderingeconomist.com/2009/01/28/why-we-cannot-save-the-too-big-to-fail-banking-institutions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thewanderingeconomist.com/2009/01/28/why-we-cannot-save-the-too-big-to-fail-banking-institutions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 22:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>johnb</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Banking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewanderingeconomist.com/2009/01/28/why-we-cannot-save-the-too-big-to-fail-banking-institutions/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Those giants of giants in the banking community, the JP Morgans, Bank of Americas and all of the other Too Big To Fail banks and investment houses have crossed the Rubicon. The have ventured so far past the point of no return that the Obama administration doesn&#8217;t even realize that they are already at the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those giants of giants in the banking community, the JP Morgans, Bank of Americas and all of the other Too Big To Fail banks and investment houses have crossed the Rubicon. The have ventured so far past the point of no return that the Obama administration doesn&#8217;t even realize that they are already at the city gates and unable to turn back. No reasonable amount of economic stimulus is going to allow these banks to recover, not now, not ever. And by &#8220;reasonable amount&#8221; I am even taking into consideration the ludicrous 2,3,4 trillion dollar amounts of money that some analysts are calling for.</p>
<p>Lets look at the problem from the simple mans perspective, the one that most people in congress are using. According to the Investment Company Institute (www.ici.org) the total value of global stock markets was approximately $62 trillion in December 2007 and has since shrunk by almost half to around $30 trillion. That loss in value alone has been spread amongst shareholders, issuing banks and bank holding companies. Banks and those investment houses now scrambling to become banks shouldered approximately $2.5 trillion dollars of that burden.</p>
<p>Taken along, that single burden, while huge, is not enough to cripple the banks. The slowdown in the real estate market commenced along with the global slowdown however and its affects, when added to stock holding losses produced a sizeable chink in the banks armor. Housing became the visible scapegoat for the banking industry. People understood housing, even those who didn&#8217;t own stocks. They saw the value of their own houses decline and understood that the value of banks&#8217; portfolios of houses also declined. Oh, those poor poor banks who loaned out trillions of dollars to customers who could no longer afford to pay. There losses on these house would be huge, right?</p>
<p>Well, maybe? First I would like to remind you that the banks began to cry uncle long before the houses came home to roost so to speak. Banks were beginning to fail before those poor people were being foreclosed upon. Banks were under huge stress before homeowner #1 failed to pay his mortgage. How is this possible?</p>
<p>Here is where the dirty little secret in the world of REAL money comes into play. According to figures released in the December 2007 quarterly review by the Bank of International Settlements (www.bis.org) the total notional amount of outstanding derivatives in all categories was a mind boggling $596 TRILLION.</p>
<p>Derivative? What the heck is a derivative? The short and simple answer is this&#8230;there has been so much freaking money created by banks over the past 50 years that there is no longer enough actual stuff for that money to buy. So, instead of buying actual stuff, like a stock certificate for General Electric, that money is spent to by a derivative against the movement of General Electric stock. Essentially, it is a bet between 2 people, one betting the stock will go up and the other betting it will go down.</p>
<p>Derivatives are also commonly highly leveraged. Lets say for example that a company uses a large quantity of Natural Gas in its equipment production, so much so that a big swing in the price of gas would hurt the company badly. They might fear that the price of NG would go up and wager $100,000 on a short term (3 month) contract that the price of Natural Gas would go up. If this was a straight bet, it would pay 1:1 up or down and would provide no real benefit versus just &#8220;taking their changes&#8221; on the gas price. So, instead they use this $100,000 as collateral on a $2million loan and use that loan to purchase the derivative contract.</p>
<p>In normal times when fluctuations are small, they may lose their initial investment, or double it. In the case that they doubled it, the proceeds are used to purchase the now pricier commodity for their daily production and operations continue. If they lose, the losses were a calculated risk and already assumed in the cost of production. But this past year was NOT NORMAL TIMES.</p>
<p>Price fluctuations over the past year were dramatic to say the least. Fluctuations in currencies, commodities, stock prices, real estate, corporate debt, everything that derivative junkies gamble on.</p>
<p>Due to the speed of the decline we could have more than a third of the total derivatives pool underwater. My best guess puts the number at about 35% upside down with the average bet losing more than 15%. That means that $208 Trillion dollars of derivatives are now being held off book by firms that are hoping and praying to be able to foist any or all of them on some government entity or otherwise stupid fool. The losses look to be somewhere in the $30-32 trillion dollar range. The problems that we are seeing and will continue to see with investments that have real assets attached to them may be able to be fixed. It will take upwards of $5-8 trillion dollars by the time its all over, and inflation will kills us when its done, but we could fix that. That $30 trillion dollar derivative monster? Now you go and figure out a way to fix THAT!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thewanderingeconomist.com/2009/01/28/why-we-cannot-save-the-too-big-to-fail-banking-institutions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Inflation, Deflation, Stagflation or something else? What&#8217;s next?</title>
		<link>http://www.thewanderingeconomist.com/2009/01/20/inflation-deflation-stagflation-or-something-else-whats-next/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thewanderingeconomist.com/2009/01/20/inflation-deflation-stagflation-or-something-else-whats-next/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 22:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>johnb</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewanderingeconomist.com/2009/01/20/inflation-deflation-stagflation-or-something-else-whats-next/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you have read the news over the past several month you know that various economists have been arguing over whether we are in for inflation, deflation or a combination of both called stagflation. The ones to watch in all of this are those at the Fed. These guys are really, really sneaky. If the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you have read the news over the past several month you know that various economists have been arguing over whether we are in for inflation, deflation or a combination of both called stagflation. The ones to watch in all of this are those at the Fed. These guys are really, really sneaky. If the Federal Reserve Board starts talking about how they are &#8220;Woried about Inflation&#8221; well, then you can assume that DEFLATION is on the way. Same with more recently all of thier talk about deflation. Its a sure sign that INFLATION is on the way. Central banks around the world have been printing new money like a bunch of drunken monkeys at a photocopiers convention.</p>
<p>The more worrisome news is THIS. Recently I have been seeing article with titles like &#8220;AMD to Cut 1100 jobs, remainder asked to cut pay&#8221; and &#8220;Caterpillar execs take 50% paycuts, rest getting 15% reductions&#8221;. This is BAD, BAD news. What we are going to get in this country is a crapstorm like we have never seen before. Corporate executives all across the country are drinking the Kool-aid and jumping on the bandwagon. What bandwagon is that you might ask? The &#8220;Let&#8217;s keep unemployment under 20% at all costs&#8221; bandwagon.</p>
<p>How are they going to do that you might ask? Well, several people I know at JC Penny corporation were &#8220;repurposed&#8221; from full time, 40 hours per week with benefits to part-time, 32 hours per week and no benefits. Like it or leave it. The companies listed earlier are using the lousy job market to reduce their costs by 15-20% on the backs of their employees. Sure, this prevents 15-20% of the workforce being laid off and it all looks good on paper, helping your fellow man keep his job and all. What does it REALLY do?</p>
<p>First off, the government doesn&#8217;t see these people showing up on the unemployment lines and the numbers look better. Breath a collective sigh of relief, the economy is getting better, right? NOPE! Now we have 100% of these people employed at less than they were before. 15-20% less in fact. Anyone want to guess how much of these peoples discretionery spending gets cut? My guess is 60-70%. Consumption plummets, corporate profits fall due to reduce economies of scale and stock prices continue to plummet. Instead of 15-20% of the people looking for new jobs, starting businesses, etc. Now we are all GETTING USED TO DOING WITH LESS.</p>
<p>This is social engineering at its best. Social engineering with a smile. </p>
<p>When it is all over, who wins. Well, the Government got by without having to pay loads of benefits it couldn&#8217;t afford anyhow. Corporations get crushed short term, but will recover nicely as they now have cheaper labor at home and people, well. People get screwed. Oh, yeah. the corporations flush with cash will use this opportunity just like Banks are using TARP funds. Buy up competition, push more shares to executives and take a defensive stance until someone else blinks.</p>
<p>Here is what I look for in the future.<br />
1. Lower wages helping corporation through this mess while burdening workers.<br />
2. Continued deflation of assets making acquisition by the largest corporations easier.<br />
3. Rising unemployment, but even larger increases in the under employed.<br />
4. Continued inflation in priority goods and consumables, food and fuel. Just because we have no money doesn&#8217;t mean that we don&#8217;t still have to eat.</p>
<p>It StagCraptasticFlation time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thewanderingeconomist.com/2009/01/20/inflation-deflation-stagflation-or-something-else-whats-next/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Liquidity Trap Here We Come!</title>
		<link>http://www.thewanderingeconomist.com/2008/12/16/liquidity-trap-here-we-come/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thewanderingeconomist.com/2008/12/16/liquidity-trap-here-we-come/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 20:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>johnb</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Banking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewanderingeconomist.com/2008/12/16/liquidity-trap-here-we-come/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What is a Liquidity Trap?
According to Wikipedia, &#8220;In monetary economics, a liquidity trap occurs when the nominal interest rate is close or equal to zero, and the monetary authority is unable to stimulate the economy with traditional monetary policy tools. In this kind of situation, people do not expect high returns on physical or financial [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>What is a Liquidity Trap?</b><br />
According to Wikipedia, &#8220;In monetary economics, a liquidity trap occurs when the nominal interest rate is close or equal to zero, and the monetary authority is unable to stimulate the economy with traditional monetary policy tools. In this kind of situation, people do not expect high returns on physical or financial investments, so they keep assets in short-term cash bank accounts or hoards rather than making long-term investments. This makes a recession even more severe, and can contribute to deflation.&#8221;</p>
<p>All one has to do is watch what happened to the first half of the TARP money to understand that we are already in a liquidity trap. Hundreds of Billions of dollars have been directly injected into the largest banks in the country with more than a Trillion more in guaranteees. What has happened so far? Banks reserves have gone up, way up, but lending has only inched forward by the tiniest fraction.</p>
<p><b>Why Isn&#8217;t This Liquidity Being Lent?</b><br />
Well now, that is the $200 Trillion Dollar question, isn&#8217;t it! My quess is that the banks are totally insolvent. That&#8217;s right, the banks have huge loads of unfundable liabilities because of their leveraging against sub-prime and other bad debt. The debt snowball that has been created is sneaking up behind them to bite them in the behind. Notice I didn&#8217;t say the issue was because of sub-prime loans, the issue is because of LEVERAGING sub-prime loans. When times were good, banks could make BILLIONS of dollars in profit from hundreds of millions of dollars in loans. They simply packaged up fractional packages of these, added in a huge batch of unsecured off-book debt and viola! Instant profits.</p>
<p>Unfortunately for them, when the reverse happens, as what occurs when the value of those originating loans fails, you can then LOSE billions on millions. In this case though I think we are looking at losses of tens of TRILLIONS against hundreds of TRILLIONS in gamblers loans.</p>
<p><b>What will the FED do next?</b><br />
Well, the Federal Reserve is out of &#8220;Traditional Tools&#8221; at this point. Lowering rates and injecting proportionally reasonable amounts of money into the banks are their primary tools. Their secondary tools? Well, they will use what they have, the ability to create money. I suspect the FED will inject LUDICROUS amounts of capital into the system. I also suspect that this money will not be made real by the external purchase of U.S. Treasuries. Nope, I susupect they will begin to monitize their own debt on behalf of the good people of the United States.</p>
<p><b>Hyper Inflation Alert</b><br />
My best guess is that they will be forced into injecting so much money, so fast, that they overshoot their targets by a factor of 50 or so where inflation is concerned. They are trying to prop up a system that is, or should be, at the end of its useful life. Keep in mind that I am not one of those people who hopes for the end of this system. I know the two likely outcomes and they both stink. Outcome #1, we all end up in debt slavery to a private banking system. Outcome #2, we end up in anarchy. I&#8217;m too old to play Mad Max. I&#8217;ll take a crash that injures us all bad enough that we stand a chance against the evil banking system when its all over. If we end up with outcome #2, I&#8217;m afraid we won&#8217;t even get a chance to play.</p>
<p><b>Another Ghastly Alternative?</b><br />
The Federal Reserve Bank may even request the creation of a NON-US DEBT Federal Reserve Note. Remember, the FEDERAL RESERVE IS A PRIVATE BANK. I don&#8217;t think that they can resist the temptation of issuing their own private currency at a time like this. This would allow them to create money as debt for the American Taxpayers as well as their own private currency. Whenever you can see (and control) both sides of the coin, you can work the factors in your favor and end up the only winner. America, the land of the Free could become America, Inc. A privately held company.</p>
<p>The opinions expressed here are the result of too many long drawn out days of staring into the future of a country whose Financial System has seperated from its Economic System. Coupled with large quantities of anti-depressants and alchohol, my appologies for the dark tone today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thewanderingeconomist.com/2008/12/16/liquidity-trap-here-we-come/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Risk of International Borrowing</title>
		<link>http://www.thewanderingeconomist.com/2008/11/02/the-risk-of-international-borrowing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thewanderingeconomist.com/2008/11/02/the-risk-of-international-borrowing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 19:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>johnb</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Banking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewanderingeconomist.com/2008/11/02/the-risk-of-international-borrowing/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The past few months has been a wild ride for Banks, Stock Brokers, Lenders and Borrowers, but the next few months could be even wilder. How can it get any wilder you ask? The unwinding of the international currency trades has really just begun. International borrowing is about to cause the collapse, or near collapse [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The past few months has been a wild ride for Banks, Stock Brokers, Lenders and Borrowers, but the next few months could be even wilder. How can it get any wilder you ask? The unwinding of the international currency trades has really just begun. International borrowing is about to cause the collapse, or near collapse of several nations.</p>
<p><b>The Carry Trade</b></p>
<p>One of the surest bets that a large financial institution could make during the past decade of prosperity was to use the Yen Carry Trade to finance the purchase of US Treasury Bonds. Here is how it would work. First, the institution would approach a bank in Japan requesting a large line of credit. In the case of large US financial institutions, investment firms and hedge funds, they would have no trouble getting this line. The line would usually carry an interest rate between 1/2 and 1 percent, essentially free money. Next the firm would use that money to purchase United States Treasure securitys for short periods of tim, usually 30 or 90 day notes. The Treasuries were paying out 3 1/2 to 4 percent, so the spread (difference between interest cost and earned intetrest) ran around 3 percent. </p>
<p><more></p>
<p>Currency exchange rates on these monsterous trades were very low, or even waived by the exchanges due to the volume of money they were bringing into the various markets. Billions of dollars of trade carried on this way for years, making Japanese Banks and those who used this carry trade extremely wealth. Two or three percent doesn&#8217;t sound like much on a passbook savings account, but how much is 3% of $10billion? You get the point. All of this was being paid for by the U.S. Government and the taxpayers because of the voracious appetite for money they had attained.</p>
<p><b>We all Fall Down</b></p>
<p>Everything goes along swimingly just so long as those things that we had come to expect continue to be true. The Japanese Government needs to continue to issue money at an interest rate near zero. The U.S. Government needs to continue to pay 3-4 percent on their Treasuries and the exchanges have to be incented to not charge a high exchange rate on thie trades. All of these factors are no longer true.</p>
<p?Japanese rates are up, U.S. Rates are down and the exchanges have so little trust that they are insisting on getting a percent or two to change the money. These "Sure Things" have turned into nightmares for some of the largest users of these facilities. You see, most of the funds that used these utilites were doing so on borrowed money that was leveraged (had a rate of collateral to debt) at a factor or 10x or greater. This is wonderful if you are borrowing $10billion against your $1billion fund and it is returning $300million or so to the fund, Your true rate of return can be 30% or more! Happy days. The same however can be true of the reverse.</p>
<p><b>It Gets Worse</b></p>
<p>When American and European companies are borrowing Yen to purchase U.S. Treasuries, their are certainly some risks involved, but in general the level of fluctuation we see is small. A percentage point or two. Of course it is in exploiting this percentage point or two difference that a successful carry trade is born. The real key is that in this case all of the currencies are robust, generally stable, world dominating currencies.</p>
<p>The same cannot be said for the &#8220;Emerging Markets&#8221;. Remote parts of Asia, Arab nations, Latin and South America all have countries who are vying to operate on a world stage. These countries all represent the emerging markets and have all been involved in international borrowing of one type or another over the past decade or more. Herein lies the real trouble for these still developing nations.</p>
<p><b>My money is worth what!</b></p>
<p>Imagine that you are a nation that was in need of some infrastructure development to get your industry going. You borrow money from a western bank, begin to improve your infrastructure, promote business and even export your goods to the international audience. Life is moving along in the right direction. Your people begin to have some personal wealth for the very first time and they too want to move forward. Perhaps they build homes or businesses and of course, given the still relative weakness of your countries economy, they too borrow money from western facilities to fund their growth. Servicing the debt is no problem at all as your economy is growing at a rapid clip and things are moving</p>
<p>Suddenly, through no fault of your own, the global economy begins to slow up. Dramatically. No worries you think, we are an energing nation, our people provide cheaper labor, maybe some new jobs will come here! Then reality begins to bear down. The slowdown may bring some jobs to your country, yes, but it also means slower growth worldwide. That slower growth scares investors and suddenly there is less investment money flowing into your country. The world doesn&#8217;t need you to grow so fast. The value of your currency, your nations &#8220;stock&#8221; on the international market, begins to fall relative to the larger western countries. Your money may be worth the same as it always was within the confines of your nation, but abroad? Its worth les, much less.</p>
<p><b>Not Enough Hard Currency</b></p>
<p>People and Governments all around the world are finding themselves in this very position as we speak (or write as it may be). Imagine being a Pakistani business man who borrowed $100,00 to grow his business. When you borrowed the money last year, the exchange rate was 60 Pakistani Rupees (PKR) to the dollar. Today the rate stands at 80 PKR to the dollar and rising. This alone represents a 30% increase in burden. Every month your company has to have higher and higher returns just to service the debt because the debt is denominated in dollars, not Rupess and must be repaid as such. There are many, many countries around the world who are suffering as much as a 70% swing in exchange rates within the last year alone.</p>
<p>The biggest problem is when the business owner goes to the local bank to exchange his rupees for dollars and is told that they have no dollars available. The pakistani rupee, as well as hundreds of local currencies, are not concidered &#8220;hard money&#8221;. There is no large operable international market for them because the country does not have a large export base and accepts other currencies universally. This problem continues up even to the government, where it may not have a total amount of exports available to convert into U.S. Dollars, or Euros, or whatever to pay its debts. This forces the country into a currency crises, even though it has plenty of available input to service its debts. It&#8217;s just contained in the wrong form.</p>
<p><b>The Result is Death</b></p>
<p>The options for these borrowers, whether individual, corporate or governmental are the same. Borrow More or Bankrupt. Either case will result in death given enough time without change. The real question is this&#8230;are western countries immune to the same disease?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thewanderingeconomist.com/2008/11/02/the-risk-of-international-borrowing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What defines a Recession? A Depression?</title>
		<link>http://www.thewanderingeconomist.com/2007/11/19/what-defines-a-recession-a-depression/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thewanderingeconomist.com/2007/11/19/what-defines-a-recession-a-depression/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 19:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>johnb</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Do You Know?]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewanderingeconomist.com/2007/11/19/what-defines-a-recession-a-depression/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There has been quite a bit of controversy in the financial news lately as to whether or not the United States is headed into a Recession, or worse yet, the possibility of a Depression. While these are just technical terms for &#8220;Bad Times&#8221;, it is important to understand how they are defined and what they [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There has been quite a bit of controversy in the financial news lately as to whether or not the United States is headed into a Recession, or worse yet, the possibility of a Depression. While these are just technical terms for &#8220;Bad Times&#8221;, it is important to understand how they are defined and what they mean to the average person on the street. In this lesson, we will examine not only the definitions, but what it means in real terms to you and I.</p>
<p>The technical definition of a Recession is quite simple, &#8220;Negative growth of the Gross Domestic Product of a country for a period of 2 quarters (6 months)&#8221;. While not everyone agrees with this definition (for very good reasons) it is a generally acceptable baseline. A Depression is simple an extended Recession that enters a second full year.</p>
<p>The most important thing about a recession, or a depression for that matter is how it feels to you, how you are personally affected. I have lived through 2 recent recessions, those of 1987 and 2000. During the recession of 1987 I was young and in the midst of a period of time in my life where my income was growing quite well. I was still at that point where I was nowhere near the peak of my earnings potential. The so-called recession of 1987 did not impact me much at all, truth be told I was quite oblivious to it at the time. I had just changed jobs and gotten quite a nice raise. I was in a position where my expenses were not out-stripping my income and the inflation during this period was pretty mild. While the country as whole was losing power, mine personally was growing.</p>
<p>The recession of 2000 was quite a different story for me personally. As a business owner involved in mechanical manufacturing, the year 2000 was just another nail in the coffin to a long slow decline in manufacturing in this country. The spedd of the decline simply kicked up another notch. The decline in manufacturing in the 2000 recession was disproportionately bad compared to most other industry segments. In orther words, 2000 hurt.</p>
<p>The average man however may have seen some of his artificially gained wealth from the dot-com boom disappear, but was otherwise unscathed. Both of these recessions came as short term corrections that did not have a lot of physically evident inflation tied to them.</p>
<p>The coming recession, or perhaps even depression will. Will what you ask? Will Hurt. Will come with TONS of inflation. Will impact the average person. Will last a long time. Will evolve into a depression (unless the clouds above open up and deliver wisdom unseen in a century).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thewanderingeconomist.com/2007/11/19/what-defines-a-recession-a-depression/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Velocity of Money</title>
		<link>http://www.thewanderingeconomist.com/2007/11/12/the-velocity-of-money/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thewanderingeconomist.com/2007/11/12/the-velocity-of-money/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 00:33:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>johnb</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Finance]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Do You Know?]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewanderingeconomist.com/2007/11/12/the-velocity-of-money/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How fast does money travel through a system? This is the root question in calculating the Velocity of Money. You might ask, &#8220;Why is this important?&#8221; well, the answer is simple, if the velocity of YOUR money is faster than that of the economy at large you can either win big, or lose big.
You can [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How fast does money travel through a system? This is the root question in calculating the Velocity of Money. You might ask, &#8220;Why is this important?&#8221; well, the answer is simple, if the velocity of YOUR money is faster than that of the economy at large you can either win big, or lose big.</p>
<p>You can learn more right here: <a href="http://www.10minutelessons.com/widget_player.html?episode=1209" target="_blank"> <img src="http://www.rebuildingeden.com/main/images/speaker.jpg" border="0" alt=" Speaker" title="Speaker" width="20" height="15" align="top" /> </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thewanderingeconomist.com/2007/11/12/the-velocity-of-money/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Inflation, Deflation and Stagflation.</title>
		<link>http://www.thewanderingeconomist.com/2007/11/07/inflation-deflation-and-stagflation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thewanderingeconomist.com/2007/11/07/inflation-deflation-and-stagflation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 00:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>johnb</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Finance]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Do You Know?]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewanderingeconomist.com/2007/11/07/inflation-deflation-and-stagflation/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What exactly is inflation? Is deflation even really possible? What the heck is Stagflation? In this episode we talk about the possibilities facing our country and what they may mean to all of us.
You can learn more right here:   
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What exactly is inflation? Is deflation even really possible? What the heck is Stagflation? In this episode we talk about the possibilities facing our country and what they may mean to all of us.</p>
<p>You can learn more right here: <a href="http://www.10minutelessons.com/widget_player.html?episode=1165" target="_blank"> <img src="http://www.rebuildingeden.com/main/images/speaker.jpg" border="0" alt=" Speaker" title="Speaker" width="20" height="15" align="top" /> </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thewanderingeconomist.com/2007/11/07/inflation-deflation-and-stagflation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Flat Tax, Fair Tax or No Tax?</title>
		<link>http://www.thewanderingeconomist.com/2007/11/02/flat-tax-fair-tax-or-no-tax/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thewanderingeconomist.com/2007/11/02/flat-tax-fair-tax-or-no-tax/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 16:32:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>johnb</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Finance]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Do You Know?]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewanderingeconomist.com/2007/11/02/flat-tax-fair-tax-or-no-tax/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What type of Income tax would you like to pay? Lets take a look at some of the basic tax plans thet get tossed about and their potential implications as we enter yet another election year and changes are sure to be blowing in the wind.
You can learn more right here:   
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What type of Income tax would you like to pay? Lets take a look at some of the basic tax plans thet get tossed about and their potential implications as we enter yet another election year and changes are sure to be blowing in the wind.</p>
<p>You can learn more right here: <a href="http://www.10minutelessons.com/widget_player.html?episode=1119" target="_blank"> <img src="http://www.rebuildingeden.com/main/images/speaker.jpg" border="0" alt=" Speaker" title="Speaker" width="20" height="15" align="top" /> </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thewanderingeconomist.com/2007/11/02/flat-tax-fair-tax-or-no-tax/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Bretton Woods Agreement</title>
		<link>http://www.thewanderingeconomist.com/2007/10/31/the-bretton-woods-agreement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thewanderingeconomist.com/2007/10/31/the-bretton-woods-agreement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 15:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>johnb</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Do You Know?]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewanderingeconomist.com/2007/10/31/the-bretton-woods-agreement/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As world war two was coming to a close the victors, or apparent victors at that time, we busily recrafting the the entire economic world. While this has proved to be of great benefit to the United States and Great Britain, the rest of the world stil bears the burden of this agreement. Don&#8217;t understand? [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As world war two was coming to a close the victors, or apparent victors at that time, we busily recrafting the the entire economic world. While this has proved to be of great benefit to the United States and Great Britain, the rest of the world stil bears the burden of this agreement. Don&#8217;t understand? Listen in and you will.</p>
<p>You can learn more right here: <a href="http://www.10minutelessons.com/widget_player.html?episode=1049" target="_blank"> <img src="http://www.rebuildingeden.com/main/images/speaker.jpg" border="0" alt=" Speaker" title="Speaker" width="20" height="15" align="top" /> </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thewanderingeconomist.com/2007/10/31/the-bretton-woods-agreement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Kyoto Accord - Ecology or Economics?</title>
		<link>http://www.thewanderingeconomist.com/2007/10/27/the-kyoto-accord-ecology-or-economics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thewanderingeconomist.com/2007/10/27/the-kyoto-accord-ecology-or-economics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 00:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>johnb</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Do You Know?]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewanderingeconomist.com/2007/10/27/the-kyoto-accord-ecology-or-economics/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Placing limits on greenhouse gases sounds like an ideal situation to even the most wishy washy environmentalist. In a perfect world we could all hold hands, reduce our emmisions to zero and sing happy songs. In the real world however consessions have to be made and the consessions written into the Kyoto Accord may have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Placing limits on greenhouse gases sounds like an ideal situation to even the most wishy washy environmentalist. In a perfect world we could all hold hands, reduce our emmisions to zero and sing happy songs. In the real world however consessions have to be made and the consessions written into the Kyoto Accord may have a lot more to do with Global Economics than Glogal Warming.</p>
<p>You can learn more right here: <a href="http://www.10minutelessons.com/widget_player.html?episode=1019" target="_blank"> <img src="http://www.rebuildingeden.com/main/images/speaker.jpg" border="0" alt=" Speaker" title="Speaker" width="20" height="15" align="top" /> </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thewanderingeconomist.com/2007/10/27/the-kyoto-accord-ecology-or-economics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
